The Orange Vest: A Symbol of Justice, Stigma, and Reform


 

The color orange has come to represent more than just a bright hue; it has become a symbol of criminal justice in many parts of the world, especially in Indonesia. In a significant moment during the early days of 2024, Jamal Ramadhan, a news photographer, captured an image that would stir public consciousness. It featured Syahrul Yasin Limpo (SYL), the former Minister of Agriculture in Indonesia, being escorted by officials of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), wearing an orange vest with the words “Tahanan KPK” (KPK Detainee) emblazoned on it.

The photograph, which went viral, became a powerful visual representation of corruption and the fight against it. SYL’s sharp gaze, surrounded by police officers, KPK staff, and journalists, conveyed a strong message to the public. The orange vest, a symbol used to identify detainees, contrasted with the rest of the surroundings, making the image powerful and unforgettable. The color orange, which has become synonymous with criminal detention in various countries, carries with it layers of meaning.

Before the widespread use of orange uniforms, prisons primarily used neutral colors like white or gray. These colors were chosen for their simplicity and uniformity. The striped black-and-white prison uniforms we know today have a long history, dating back to the 1820s when the Auburn Prison system in New York introduced them. The stripes symbolized the iron bars of the prison and the silhouette of the sun shining through a cell window, signaling the prisoners’ criminal status. This uniform helped identify escapees in the event of a breakout, marking them immediately as criminals.

The striped uniforms were more than just a method of identification; they also served as a form of control. In the Auburn system, prisoners were required to walk in lockstep and maintain silence, using their uniforms as a means to enforce discipline. Over time, however, the psychological and social impact of these uniforms began to shift. They were increasingly seen as symbols of degradation and human rights abuses, particularly when associated with forced labor or chain gangs.

By the early 20th century, many prisons moved away from the striped uniform to solid colors, which were thought to be more aligned with the goals of rehabilitation. Prisoners in California, for instance, wore denim jeans and chambray shirts. This shift was seen as a more humane approach, and different colors were introduced to represent different levels of crime and punishment. In some states, like North Carolina, prisoners wore different colors based on the severity of their crimes, from gray for high-level offenders to green for those convicted of minor offenses.

In some instances, prisons used unconventional colors, like pink, to deter escape attempts. In Cleveland County, the use of pink uniforms was meant to make prisoners feel vulnerable and deter any thoughts of escape. These decisions on prison attire were often rooted in practicality and security, focusing on reducing risks and making prisoners easily identifiable.

It wasn’t until the 1970s that the color orange gained widespread popularity in American prisons. Its introduction in prisons marked a major shift towards standardization and practicality. Orange uniforms were easier to see, even from a distance, which made them ideal for monitoring prisoners in and out of secure areas. The bright color not only served security purposes but also helped reduce the stigma associated with prison attire.

The introduction of the orange vest in Indonesian prisons can be traced back to 2013, when the KPK used it for corruption suspects. The bright orange vest was a deliberate choice designed to make a powerful statement: those wearing it were guilty of corruption. This new approach was meant to create a deterrent effect, as it was thought that the visibility of these individuals would help shame them publicly.

The KPK’s decision to use orange vests for corruption detainees was significant. It not only identified the detainees as corrupt individuals but also aligned them with the broader public effort to combat corruption. The vest became a symbol of the fight against this societal ill, which has long plagued Indonesia and many other countries.

The color orange, which dominates the KPK’s uniforms, has a strong psychological effect. It stands out, creating a clear contrast with the environment around it. This visibility is both a tool for prison security and a public statement about the severity of the crime. The impact of this color is not only practical but emotional, as it evokes feelings of discomfort and urgency. It draws attention to those wearing it, making them stand out in a way that serves to reinforce their status as criminals.

This is why the KPK chose the orange vest to symbolize those accused of corruption: to make them visible, to make their crime undeniable. The simple use of color in this context reinforces the idea that the fight against corruption is not just a matter of legal proceedings; it is also about social consciousness and public responsibility.

Orange is not only used in Indonesia to signify criminality but also in many countries around the world. Following the events of September 11, 2001, the color became even more symbolic, particularly in high-security detention facilities like Guantanamo Bay. As described by Elspeth Van Veeren in her thesis, “Orange Prison Jumpsuit,” the orange uniform became a marker of extreme security and the government’s authority over detainees.

The color’s use spread beyond the prison system and entered popular culture, largely through the success of shows like “Orange is the New Black.” This Netflix series, which ran from 2013 to 2019, brought the orange prison jumpsuit into the public consciousness, turning it into a symbol of not only criminality but also social issues like inequality, injustice, and human rights.

The visual power of the orange vest, combined with media depictions of detainees, has a profound effect on public perception. Those wearing orange are often seen through a lens of suspicion and hostility. The use of orange can reinforce the negative stereotypes about prisoners, making them seem more dangerous or less worthy of rehabilitation. At the same time, it serves as a reminder of the societal need to confront corruption and criminal activity.

In Indonesia, the KPK’s use of the orange vest continues to send a clear message about the government’s stance on corruption. It helps shape the public’s understanding of the issue, not just as a legal challenge, but as a moral one. By putting suspects on display in this manner, the KPK hopes to make the fight against corruption more visible and more pressing for the public.

The orange vest, originally introduced as a practical security measure, has become a potent symbol of criminality, punishment, and reform. It represents a broader cultural shift in how societies perceive crime and punishment. From its roots in prison systems to its use by the KPK in Indonesia, the orange vest has come to stand for much more than just identification. It is now a marker of shame, a tool for deterrence, and a public symbol of the fight against corruption. As we continue to grapple with issues of justice, security, and reform, the color orange will undoubtedly remain a powerful, ever-present reminder of the need for change.

Comments